>>I would be curious to get feedback from implementors of 
>>draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-10.txt
>>on what they have implemented and what they find useful.

        as i said during meeting, i share pekka's opinion that
        combination of Qtype and ICMP code is unneededly complex,
        however i would say it is too late to change unfortunately.

>               flag bit to decide whether or not to respond to NIQ to
>                       RFC3041 address

        this bit also affects whether or not to include RFC3041 address
        into Qtype=3 response.

>               flag bit to decide whether or not to respond to node addresses
>                       NIQ (Qtype=2) - we may not want to reveal address on
>                       other interfaces when A bit is present, like intranet
>                       side of firewall machine

        typo: Qtype=3.

itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to