On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>I would be curious to get feedback from implementors of > >>draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-10.txt > >>on what they have implemented and what they find useful. > > as i said during meeting, i share pekka's opinion that > combination of Qtype and ICMP code is unneededly complex, > however i would say it is too late to change unfortunately.
.. which is why I argued that we should not propagate our mistakes, and go for Experimental not PS and add a stronger applicability statement. I really think some functionality like a simple version of NIQ is useful: but if we intend it for general consumption rather than as (still!) a rather limited implementation of Internet-Draft, we must do it *properly*. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
