In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 16 Jul 2003 05:06:28 -0700), Alain Durand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > We, USAGI, have two implementations. One is in-kernel, > > and other is user-space daemon. > > We have tried supporting all qtypes and all flags. > > (However, anycast and configurable policy is not supported.) > > Do you implement queries with a name as subject using the multicast > hash? > If yes, did you find this useful? If you mean NI Group address, yes, we support it. Well, we can live without it, however, it is reasonable to have NI Group address as we do for NS (solicited node address). Of course, if some do not support this, it becomes unuseful. :-p > >> Last but not least, we implement it also over ICMPv4 (not defined in > >> the spec yet). > > > > type/codes? > > experimentally same as v6. This would have to be defined and reserved > from IANA. Hmm, okay... -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
