Tony Hain wrote:


They do have a disproportionate voice, primarily because the operator of the
edge network (where these addresses would be used) is disenfranchised from
the IETF. Yes the ox of the app developer is being gored here, but the
alternative to a few in the middle is goring the masses at the edge. There
is nothing more here than simple cost/benefit analysis being done by one
side, rather than from the perspective of the system as a whole.



Yet another old argument. I remember several opposing voices from the SL debate.
I am running a large edge network. I have both PI and PA v4 and yet I don't see
the need for site-locals. I think it is time to drop the "silent majority" argument.


What edge-network do you run?

Cheers Leif



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to