On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Keith Moore wrote: > > RFC 3056 says: > > > > Suppose that a subscriber site has at least one valid, globally > > unique 32-bit IPv4 address, referred to in this document as V4ADDR. > > This address MUST be duly allocated to the site by an address > > registry (possibly via a service provider) and it MUST NOT be a > > private address [RFC 1918]. > > > > Now, which word in "MUST NOT" is hard to understand? > > well, we don't say that hosts should block them.
IMHO that would the wrong thing to do. The hosts should not care whether the prefix they're autoconfiguring from is from 2002::/16 or some other block. They don't implement 6to4, so making them care would seem like a layer violation. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
