> That's an interesting expectation. As co-author of the planned > deprecation draft, I'd been assuming a more classical deprecation > action, in which we would simply state the previous semantics of > FEC0::/10, state that the prefix SHOULD NOT be used, but leave it > permanently assigned by IANA. > > This would break nothing that runs today. > > What do people think?
I assume that "permanently assigned to IANA" has the same semantics as "unassigned" (http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-address-space). If not, what is the difference? CP -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
