> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Keith Moore wrote: > > > We already have alternatives > > > to site-local addresses: 6to4 addresses based on PI or RFC1918 > > > IPv4 addresses. > > > > 6to4 addresses based on RFC 1918 addresses should be forbidden. > > IMHO, this is an oversight in the 6to4 RFC. > > They are already forbidden (but perhaps you're saying the forbidding > should be even stronger than it's today).
yes, I'm saying that we should make it entirely clear that use of RFC 1918 addresses within 6to4 addresses are a violation of the standard, and that hosts should block them. let's stamp out scoped addresses in our lifetime. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
