Exactly. SLs are dead maybe the only alternative is A. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Erik Gullerud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:03 AM > To: Bob Hinden > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing > > > On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 20:06, Bob Hinden wrote: > > > I would like to hear from the working group on how we > should proceed. > > I > > think the choices are: > > I'd like to see A happen. Going for B, and even worse C, will > just prolong the current state of uncertainty where a lot of > people have heard that site-locals might be deprecated, but > are uncertain as to whether they need to concern themselves > with support for them or not in ongoing development etc. > > Let's just get rid of the darn things and move on - please. > > /leg > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
