At 10:30 AM 9/08/2003 -0400, Bound, Jim wrote:

I think we have this known.

1.  Consensus is SLs are not going to achieve consensus.
2.  hinden draft works IMO?

What don't you like about hinden draft "idea"?

Well - to answer this question of Jims, I'm not sure it (the Hinden/Haberman draft) is finished yet - to my mind there are some further considerations that are relevant here. I've prepared a commentary on the proposal as an Internet draft. The draft will be published this week as draft-huston-ipv6-local-use-comments-00.txt

I've also put a copy online at:
http://www.potaroo.net/papers/2003/draft-huston-ipv6-local-use-comments-00.txt


regards,


Geoff







--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to