> > You are awfully cavalier with taking such risks with the > > market. What if the market does not like the replacement? The > > market will stay in limbo.
> Yes I am. Middle name is risk. Sometimes folks don't want it sometimes > they do. IPv6 offers no value if it does not do things differently than IPv4. If you want the illusion of predictability, stick with IPv4. If you want something that might work better, try IPv6. (Actually you can do both, use IPv4 for some apps and IPv6 for others._ But the cost of having things work better is change. And there cannot be change without risk. Therefore IPv6 is pointless without risk. The desire to improve something while avoiding all risk is the primary cause of second-system effect. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
