Yoav Nir writes:
> There is no such consensus that protocol variants are a good thing.
> I think it's just the opposite. Although I don't think it's Tero's
> job to stop the publication of three documents that are "for the
> same thing". That should be done by the community. 

I am most definately not trying to stop any of the documents.

I am trying to make sure that the documents can go forward and get
IANA allocations done in a nice and consistent way, which will also
make it easier for implementors to implement one or multiple of those
methods.

The actual numbers used inside the protocols does not affect the
actual protocols that much, especially as there are no numbers in any
of the documents yet (i.e. you cannot say changing the numbers would
break interoperability with early implementations).
-- 
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to