On 8/3/11 4:55 PM, "Tero Kivinen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Yoav Nir writes: >> There is no such consensus that protocol variants are a good thing. >> I think it's just the opposite. Although I don't think it's Tero's >> job to stop the publication of three documents that are "for the >> same thing". That should be done by the community. > >I am most definately not trying to stop any of the documents. > >I am trying to make sure that the documents can go forward and get >IANA allocations done in a nice and consistent way, which will also >make it easier for implementors to implement one or multiple of those >methods. Fully agree. But I also think that it *is* up to the community to stop these three from moving on, and choose only one of them instead. Since we haven't found any expert who will say that one is definitely better than the others, almost any selection method will do. Sean and Paul rolling a big fuzzy die at the SAAG meeting in Tai-Pei is one good way to do this. Yoav _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
