On Feb 13, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> yes, the text you quote on IETF Review is acceptable to me. I am basically > looking for a process that will allow members of this WG to opine on: > > - Whether the spec is technically sound, interoperable etc. > - Whether the spec is secure. > - Whether it is appropriate to add it to IKEv1 (i.e. the spec would not > damage adoption of IKEv2 and would not create future issues around migration > to IKEv2). > > These goals are provided by the IETF Review process as defined in 5226, but > not by the "lower" criteria. I still find this to be too heavy-weight for my tastes, but I may be the only one who thinks so. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
