On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Daniel Migault wrote:

Especially thinking of constrained devices.
AES-GCM with 8 octet SHOULD : the reason for not having SHOULD+ is that most 
IoT devices seems to use CCM
AES-CCM with 8 octet SHOULD+

I would prefer that constrained devices put their specs in 
draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-03

Or that we list that those versions should only be used if the server is
talking to constrained devices. But maybe that's too much text, and we
should stick to SHOULD (as most implementations handle all octet sizes
anyway)

I would have thought of 3DES with similar or slightly less weight as 
CHACHA20_POLY1025 so

Without actual interop and deployment experience, I would not yet want
to officially prefer CHACHA20_POLY1025 over 3DES.

Paul

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to