On Tue, 31 May 2016, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) wrote:
From what I am reading, there isn't an interest in splitting puzzles out as experimental. If you feel strongly that puzzles should be split out into a separate experimental draft, please speak up. If we don't hear anything by Monday, June 6, we will begin making preparations to send the draft as-is to the IESG.
I still prefer the puzzles going into a seperate document, so we as an implementor could say we implement the anti-ddos RFC without having to explain we implement some parts and not other parts. I don't think this matters much for the structure of the document, as it just puts Section 7 to 11 in a separate document.
Since we are wrapping up the WGLC, please also consider this a final call for comments on the draft before we send it off.
Responding to this in a separate email. Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
