On 2018-07-25, 5:27 PM, "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I do have one issue I’ve been pondering, though; we do an IKE_AUX exchange, and then follow it up with an IKE_AUTH exchange. At least with my accent, those are phonetically quite close. It would be nice if we could come up with an alternative name to IKE_AUX that was just as descriptive, but wasn’t such a near collision (and no, I don’t have any immediate suggestions). I have the same issue when discussing the draft. Off the top of my head, IKE_PRE_AUTH could work.
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
