On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Daniel Van Geest wrote:
I do have one issue I’ve been pondering, though; we do an IKE_AUX exchange, and then follow it up with an IKE_AUTH
I agree, the name is not the best for verbal language.
I have the same issue when discussing the draft. Off the top of my head, IKE_PRE_AUTH could work.
I think IKE_PRE_AUTH is indeed better. Other name could be: IKE_SUPP[LEMENT] or IKE_INIT_SUPP[LEMENT] Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
