Probably IKE_INT (intermediate)? Actually I was thinking of this name when started writing the draft...
IKE_PRE_AUTH sounds to me like it is somehow bound to authentication, while in fact it is multi-purpose and can be used for transferring any additional data before IKE_AUTH... I do have one issue I’ve been pondering, though; we do an IKE_AUX exchange, and then follow it up with an IKE_AUTH exchange. At least with my accent, those are phonetically quite close. It would be nice if we could come up with an alternative name to IKE_AUX that was just as descriptive, but wasn’t such a near collision (and no, I don’t have any immediate suggestions). I have the same issue when discussing the draft. Off the top of my head, IKE_PRE_AUTH could work.
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
