Not sure my vote as a co-author will count, but I also support the adoption.
There are interests in the community on this and I believe there is an interoperability test based on the current version of the draft. CJ > On 4 Nov 2019, at 14:42, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Graham Bartlett (grbartle) wrote: > >> Like Valery, I'm a co-author and support adoption. >> >> I have seen a lot of customer interest in this draft as it will allow >> organisations to implement standard based PQC at scale. One main driver >> being reduction of business risk. >> >> This will provide users of IKEv2 to protect themselves when migrating to a >> PQ world. > > Agreed, please adopt. And libreswan plans to implement this. > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec -- PQ Solutions Limited (trading as ‘Post-Quantum’) is a private limited company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number 06808505. This email is meant only for the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. For more information about Post-Quantum, please visit www.post-quantum.com <http://www.post-quantum.com>. In the course of our business relationship, we may collect, store and transfer information about you. Please see our privacy notice at www.post-quantum.com/privacy-notice <http://www.post-quantum.com/privacy-notice> to learn about how we use this information. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
