Hey, I also strongly support adoption. > It is an open question whether or not it is feasible to build a > Quantum Computer (and if so, when one might be implemented), but if > > Feasibility of some quantum computer is becoming much less of an open > question; perhaps we want some qualifiers about efficiency, scale, > and/or general-purpose-nature. > Do we have a reference for this "it is believed", or is it just the > outcome of the WG discussions?
Regarding this discussion (and sorry if this was discussed before and I didn't realize). Do we really need the term post-quantum in the title (and maybe even in the abstract)? The draft tells how to do multiple/hybrid key-exchanges in IKEv2, PQ is the major motivation but not the only use case. As far as I'm familiar with the draft, you could easily do DH + ECDH with it (and if not I'd really like it be like that). Regards Tobias > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: IPsec <ipsec-boun...@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von Tero Kivinen > Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. November 2019 23:42 > An: ipsec@ietf.org > Betreff: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2 > > This is adoption call for the draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2 > draft to be accepted to be WG Document. This draft has been around for > some time, and we have been discussing it in the meetings. > > If you support adopting this document as WG Document, then send email > indicating your support to the ipsec@ietf.org mailing-list. If you have any > comments or reservations send them to the list too. > > This adoption call finishes 2019-11-11. > -- > kivi...@iki.fi > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
