Michael Richardson writes: > > Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we should use normal ESP format i.e. have ESP SPI using > > following format: > > I mostly agree. > But: > > > (0-255 bytes) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | > > It would be nice to be able to put enough padding to make packets at least > 1280, ideally 2048 bytes in size. > > that would let us diagnose MTU issues better.
That (0-255 bytes) is leftover from the figure I copied from the RFC4303, where it was part of the length of the padding field. In my case I did assume that payload can be of any length, so I agree on your fix... -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
