Loads of self-promotional nonsense. What he's saying is "Gee, we need LDPv6 and we'll try to make an RFC out of it". Wow.
===== Mistyped and autocorrected on a clunky virtual keyboard On 12. apr. 2013, at 20:54, Jim Small <[email protected]> wrote: > This is the only thing I recall seeing from Cisco (Blog Entry) – also took a > quick look through Cisco Live 365 site and didn’t see anything… > http://blogs.cisco.com/getyourbuildon/moving-networks-to-ipv6-mpls-bye-bye-ipv4-mpls/ > > --Jim > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Ivan Pepelnjak > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 6:37 AM > To: 'Jim Trotz'; [email protected] > Subject: RE: IPV6 in the network core and MPLS > > If you want to use MPLS, you still need IPv4 core. None of the major vendors > (that I’m aware of) support LDPv6 or VPNv4 with IPv6 next hops ... Of course > I hope someone will jump in and correct me ;) > > Best, > Ivan > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Jim Trotz > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 12:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: IPV6 in the network core and MPLS > > I have been trying to find out if we can use MPLS & LDP to setup MPLS VPNS > within our all IPV6 network. Everything I read says no, LDP & MPLS don't > support native IPV6, you have to use 6VPE and IPV4 in the core. > > Is this true? PS: We are an all Cisco IOS/NXOS based network.
