On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 03:41:58PM +0100, "Roger Jørgensen" wrote: > It should be possible to have a network running DHCP without any RA, if > someone wants to do that. As far as I know, and you need RAs in todays > world because DHCPv6 can not give out defaultroute. It break the > standard if it (DHCPv6) does...
DHCPv6 does not provide any on-link information. So you would have to include those, too. IIRC dibbler dhcp implementation has their own option to specificy prefix length and on-link information so I assume you can already use it standalone without RA. But I don't see any benefit in doing so. (dibbler already supports sending gateway and route informations in dhcpv6). Greetings, Hannes