On 28/dic/2013, at 17:36, Hannes Frederic Sowa <han...@stressinduktion.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 03:41:58PM +0100, "Roger Jørgensen" wrote: >> It should be possible to have a network running DHCP without any RA, if >> someone wants to do that. As far as I know, and you need RAs in todays >> world because DHCPv6 can not give out defaultroute. It break the >> standard if it (DHCPv6) does... > > DHCPv6 does not provide any on-link information. So you would have to > include those, too. IIRC dibbler dhcp implementation has their own option > to specificy prefix length and on-link information so I assume you can > already use it standalone without RA. But I don't see any benefit in > doing so. > > (dibbler already supports sending gateway and route informations in > dhcpv6). Dibbler sends them, but no DHCPv6 client except dibbler's can use them. Non-standard solutions are useless in this case. -- Marco Sommani Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Informatica e Telematica Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 1 56124 Pisa - Italia work: +390506212127 mobile: +393487981019 fax: +390503158327 mailto:marco.somm...@iit.cnr.it
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
