On 26/10/15 11:12, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> Marco, Nick - what do you think? I definitely see a lot of interest
>> and support in the community for moving IPv6-only
>> network out of the experimental state. Probably moving dual-stack
>> network to legacy this meeting might be bit extreme (we do care about
>> people who do not care about Ipv6 yet, don't we? ;)) and we do not
>> provide bad network experience), but what about stop calling it
>> "experimental" and include it in the list of the standard SSIDs?
> 
> Proposal: rename the v6-only network to "ripemtg-new" and keep the current 
> "ripemtg" for RIPE71. For RIPE72 (2016!) rename the dual-stack network to 
> "ripemtg-legacy" and the v6-only to "ripemtg".
> 
> There will be the legacy network for people/devices/etc that have trouble on 
> IPv6-only. We definitely should make sure we offer workable networking for 
> everybody. But I think it's about time people started realising it explicitly 
> when they need a legacy protocol to keep working.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sander
> 
> 

The above seems perfect, I won't be around to connect to ripemtg-new but
will look forward to connecting to ripemtg at Ripe 72 :-)

Cheers,

Guy

Reply via email to