On 5/28/20 6:50 PM, Nico Schottelius wrote:
Jens Link <[email protected]> writes:
Nico Schottelius <[email protected]> writes:
I personally think for each IPv4 only service we should create an IPv6
only service and use that for ripe/ieee/network related events.
I once removed the A record to a wiki I run for several nerds. I won't
do that again. So much crying. And you can try for yourself: Put a link
on twitter to an IPv6 only resource and see how many people are
complaining.
You are a person of your word and I take the liberty to share the
experiment on here:
https://twitter.com/QuuxBerlin/status/1266021157469290501
(so far did not see anyone complaining)
no complaints from my IPv6-only (MAP-E) connection ;)
Everyone in our community should be able to get IPv6 anywhere, anytime.
*should*
I really don't think there is an excuse. HE.net work w/ static IPs,
IPv6VPN.ch that we provide works with any kind of nat and I'd be open to
make the latter a public service, if it was backed by more than just
ungleich.
In a nutshell, everyone can get IPv6 anywhere.
So from my point of view it's only a matter of motivation and for us -
in the network community - I'd assume that everybody is motivated to get
connected via IPv6.
Best regards,
Nico
--
Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit www.datacenterlight.ch
