On Fri, 29 May 2020, Philip Homburg wrote:
That also means actively using, promoting and preferring IPv6 only
services.
(I'm assuming that IPv6 only meens a service that is reachable only over IPv6
and not IPv4)
I don't see why promoting communication failures is a good thing. Except
possibly as a fun thing to nudge people to take action. For example a
quiz with prizes could be hosted on an IPv6-only platform.
And not accepting hardware, software or platforms which
lack features in IPv6 only environments.
I don't know where to put it, but there may be a benefit for a list that
lists known internet services that do not (or poorly) support IPv6 and with
replacements that do support them.
Such a list may have two advantages:
1) Somebody who likes to promote IPv6 would not have to spend time looking
for good alternatives to known brands
2) Being on a list of backward companies is bad pr for any company, so it
may stimulate companies to get off the wrong part of the list.
ipv6shamelist.org seems to be available :-)
Cheers,
Carlos
