On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:51:47PM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote: > [..] >>> I don't know where to put it, but there may be a benefit for a list that >>> lists known internet services that do not (or poorly) support IPv6 and with >>> replacements that do support them.
>> You have a point and it has actually been started about a year ago: >> https://redmine.ungleich.ch/projects/ipv6/wiki/IPv6_Hardware_Compatibility_List > What I meant was services: > - what to use instead of github (probably gitlab) > - what to use instead of zoom (maybe jitsi, but does jitsi scale?) > - and where this discussion started, what to use instead of eventbrite.nl right, we need to get at this from an end user perspective. Due to the pandemic, many people are now using their home internet connection for work. As the network providers for these home networks frequently were among the first to encounter the shortage of IPv4 addresses, many of these networks provide IPv6 connectivity while at the same time using some kind of NAT to provide IPv4 connectivity. These NAT systems tend to be overloaded, now probably more than usual. So the message to users is "If you have trouble to access company A providing service X, it might be because A does not support IPv6 connections. Try company B as an alternative who does have IPv6". Regards, Wolfgang Zenker -- punkt.de GmbH Tel. +49 721 9109-500 Fax: -100 .infrastructure [email protected] https://infrastructure.punkt.de/ Kaiserallee 13a CEO: Jürgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian Stein D-76133 Karlsruhe AG Mannheim HRB 108285
