Dez C <[email protected]> writes:
> On 5/29/20 10:38 AM, Jens Link wrote: >> Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> having the meetings, for starters. >> Sure. Let's talk more about deploying IPv6. Did work very well for the >> last decade / years. > > oh, but it has. Talking about issues, creating traction, usually > helps. Just check the google stats for the percentage of users > accessing google via IPv6: It's always the two sides technology and sociological actions that need to work together. However at this point in time I think we, as a network community, have to admit that we carry the responsibility to drive the change and have to embrace it. That means that we need to be one step ahead, probably make one more sacrifice then the end user will ever do. And today, not tomorrow go with IPv6. That also means actively using, promoting and preferring IPv6 only services. Even if they lack behind in some regards. And not accepting hardware, software or platforms which lack features in IPv6 only environments. If we don't take that responsibility today, everyone of us is contributing to a very distorted Internet without the ability to have real end-to-end connectivity. If not the network community, who else will take action in going towards IPv6 only? Best regards, Nico "Change starts from within" -- Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit www.datacenterlight.ch
