I do not appreciate your personal attack; reading either this specific message or the archive should make it clear that I did not "miss this major issue", I just do not agree with Keith and you that "outlawing" local addresses will accomplish anything to solve those issues.
Please explain to me how the job of applications gets any easier if the local addressing is done with a hijacked prefix....
--On Monday, November 3, 2003 16:08 +0100 Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we need anything else from a technical perspective?
I think I and Keith Moore commented on the application impact, and to the extent that the current document doesn't state the application impact very accurately.
Once that application impact is better known one could and should discuss the cost/benefit tradeoffs.
Since you missed the above rather major point, I wouldn't be surprised if your summary misses other points that have been made.
Erik
Hans Kruse, Associate Professor J. Warren McClure School of Communication Systems Management Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701 740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
