-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2004-04-13, at 15.53, JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote: > Is there any other reason for not being clear on this (i.e., not > clearly say the stateful protocol is DHCPv6)? Or is this just a > matter of preference? I would prefer 2+Y. Simply to minimize dependencies... - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQHwzXKarNKXTPFCVEQLqfwCg3yZRtkYnZ/lBOgIgZUlBkIo12OIAnivo gA80dTpOqPsNpwmjzmrlkixU =ehoy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
