I'm for (1) DHCPv6 and a reference to RFC 3315 (X). - Bernie Volz
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol Hi all, > >Question A: how should rfc2462bis specify the stateful protocol? > > > >possible answers: > > 1. clearly say that stateful address configuration is DHCPv6 > > 2. (intentionally) do not say anything about this, and (implicitly > > or explicitly) leave it to the node requirements document > > > > 1. We have DHCPv6. Let's just use it and stop confusing people with > the notion that there might be another stateful address configuration > protocol. > > >Question B: which references should rfc2462bis have on this > matter? > > > >possible answers: > > X. add an informative reference to RFC3315 > > Y. add an informative reference to node-req > > Z. add informative references to both RFC3315 and node-req > > W. do not add any references for this issue (neither > RFC3315 nor node-req) > > > > X. make it simple. I agree with X. Y would make node-req specify more than the original RFC, which is not the purpose. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
