>>>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:46:46 +0900, >>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I also wanted to recall a conversation that taken place at the IPv6 interim >> meeting about the usefulness of the 'O' bit ... however, if this >> conversation is out-of-scope to the revision of RFC 2461, that's fine and we >> can drop it. > (You meant the revison of RFC 2462?) I think it is in the scope of > this work, but do you have a concrete reference to the conversation? > Which interim meeting are you talking about? The latest ipv6 interim > meeting I remember is the one held in Sep/Oct 1999. I've roughly gone > through the meeting minutes at > http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/minutes/ipng-minutes-Sep99.txt > but I could not find a discussion relevant to this topic. Sorry, I was not careful enough: the latest one should be the one in May/Jun 2001. I do remember the meeting, but in my poor memory it was an ngtrans interim meeting (not a joint meeting). Still, I could not find a useful reference from the minutes: http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/minutes/ipng-meeting-may2001.txt JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
