<counter-rant> All this monomanic ISP-bashing needs to stop now, if IPv6 is ever to take off in any manner.
The claim that RH0 is "just a tool" and that there is no "amplification" is narrow-sighted at best, since I understood from what has been discussed here that it can indeed cause excessive bandwith utilization along a path, and is therefore a much too useful tool in a miscreant's hand to let loose on the unsuspecting masses. Also, please do note, one man's tool to "select which ISP to use" can easily be viewed by the ISPs as a tool for theft of service, inducing routers to carry packets between customers A and B where neither customer has any direct or indirect customer/provider relationship with the providers of the path which is being used. Why would any reasonable ISP tolerate such (potential) behaviour? </counter-rant> Best regards, - Håvard -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
