> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Vixie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> if we're going to expect routability to provide connectivity > in some cases > but not all, which is what's implied by saying "never appear > off-site", then > we need to know what cases and exactly what noncases. so > what's a "site"? > or what's an "administrative domain"? or call it what you > want -- what is it > and how do the routing domain, connectivity domain, and the > allocation domain > relate to each other? I think the answers to these questions are exactly the same as they would be for IPv4 private address blocks, although it's more imperative in the case of IPv4 that they be non-routable outside whatever boundaries one sets. So then ... > if i seem anxious to cut to the chase it's because i've read > all this before > when "site local" was first proposed and then later, again, > when it was > deprecated. so let's keep our feet on the ground and define > our terms and > make sure we have common understanding before anybody runs out ahead. Does anyone have an answer to this? Site local were deprecated because the consensus was that there's no need for "private" addresses in IPv6. Are these ULA-Cs simply taking their place? Should routers not forward ULAs under any circumstance? Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
