On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
if i seem anxious to cut to the chase it's because i've read
all this before when "site local" was first proposed and then
later, again,
when it was deprecated. so let's keep our feet on the ground and
define
our terms and make sure we have common understanding before
anybody runs out ahead.
Does anyone have an answer to this? Site local were deprecated because
the consensus was that there's no need for "private" addresses in
IPv6.
I thought "Site Locals" were deprecated because people couldn't agree
on what a "site" was.
Are these ULA-Cs simply taking their place?
That's my impression, but then again, I haven't see the revised ULA-C
draft.
Should routers not forward ULAs under any circumstance?
Wouldn't that make them "link locals"?
Rgds,
-drc
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
