> Oddly enough, what I recommend for now is - put ULA-C on the > back burner.
I generally agree with what Brian has said here and I especially support his recommendation to push this to the backburner and let it stew for a while. We really need more clarity on use-cases for this before going further. And, we need to get a broader perspective, i.e. more people looking at the issues. > Make travel plans to attend the next IANA meeting, and in the > meantime, join the IANA mailing lists. Voice your concern > over PI space issues, and the making available of small PI > blocks to all comers. In particular, the whole issue of PI versus ULA-C has not been clearly stated. What does ULA-C bring to the table that cannot be done with PI addresses? If the answer is nothing, then ULA-C is not needed at all. --Michael Dillon -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
