Brian D, On 2007-06-29 20:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think that ULA has come about as an answer to the need for IPv6 space, which does not have procedural overhead or cost (both of which occur when requesting space from RIRs).
There are more motivations than that - the ability to generate a ULA prefix automatically, for example, allows a zero-config disconnected network to come up with a valid prefix that could in fact be used for ad-hoc routing with a neighbour. And there are lots of enterprise scenarios where private address space is highly desired. Without regard to what is decided about ULA-C, I think ULA is here to stay. Brian C -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
