> > We would like to get your comments on the following two choices:
> >
> > 1) Deprecate RH0 as specified in <draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt>.
> >
> > 2) Revising the draft to restrict the usage of RH0. This would
>
> If I were to choose one I support choice #1, but I can live with
> choice #2 (but in that case just turning it off by default seems
> sufficient to me). The most important point for me is to make the
for me, the point is to ship the document as an RFC sooner, the better.
there are giant companies who are waiting for RFC to be published.
they are holding their security updates until RFC gets published.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
