On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:43:19PM -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
> We would like to get your comments on the following two choices:
>
> 1) Deprecate RH0 as specified in <draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt>.
I would have originally supported option (2), because it would have
allowed RH0 to be used in a relatively harmless way. However, I now
believe (1) is the practical option, because as Joe says, we can
consider RH0 as "poisioned".
David.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
