> Hi Bob,
> We would like to get your comments on the following two choices:
>
> 1) Deprecate RH0 as specified in <draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt>.
I vote for this option. It's a clean solution and leaves as well place for a
future (re-)definition of additional RH functionalities if needed.
My 2 cents
Olaf
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
