Henmant, On Aug 13, 2010, at 09:33 MDT, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Bush [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 10:50 AM > To: Hemant Singh (shemant) > Cc: Alain Durand; Pekka Savola; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Brian E Carpenter; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: Router redirects in Node Requirements document > >> the vast majority of inte-router links today are p2p ethernet. hence >> the /127 draft, which this proposal is yet another religious attack on >> actual internet operations. > > So this p2p ethernet could still be traversing over SONET in which case, > again, routers do not let ND be configured over such a link.
It would be dumb to put Ethernet over SONET, (in these applications). It's overwhelmingly p2p Ethernet over WDM or over dark fiber. > Anyway, > even if not SONET transport, if you have p2p inter router link, doesn't > each router have more network interfaces over which ND and Redirect > still needs to be supported? Yes, that is the definition of a router. -shane > > Hemant > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
