Suresh,

>> 4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
>> 5) full IPv6 support with DHCPv6
>> by partly broken I mean lacking dual stack / IPv4/IPv6 multihoming support. 
>> i.e happy eyeballs or having other serious short comings. I do not want to 
>> enable IPv6 on hosts implementations that e.g have 75 second timeout to 
>> switch from IPv6 to IPv4 (well known fruit vendor).
>> we don't care about 1. we do _not_ want to deliver IPv6 service to 2 + 3. so 
>> the problematic one is 4.
>> does anyone know of any class 4 IPv6 implementation?
> 
> Windows XP.

does XP come with IPv6 enabled by default? if not I would classify it with 
Win95... i.e. don't care.
with IPv6 enabled, does it even give me happy eyeballs? most likely a class 2 
stack, which would need an upgrade anyway.

cheers,
Ole
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to