The whole lack of IPv6 transport in XP for DNS kinda fails the 'full IPv6 support without DHCPv6' classifier for me.
Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Ole Troan > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:32 AM > To: Suresh Krishnan > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: AW: New version available > > Suresh, > > >> 4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6 > >> 5) full IPv6 support with DHCPv6 > >> by partly broken I mean lacking dual stack / IPv4/IPv6 > multihoming support. i.e happy eyeballs or having other > serious short comings. I do not want to enable IPv6 on hosts > implementations that e.g have 75 second timeout to switch > from IPv6 to IPv4 (well known fruit vendor). > >> we don't care about 1. we do _not_ want to deliver IPv6 > service to 2 + 3. so the problematic one is 4. > >> does anyone know of any class 4 IPv6 implementation? > > > > Windows XP. > > does XP come with IPv6 enabled by default? if not I would > classify it with Win95... i.e. don't care. > with IPv6 enabled, does it even give me happy eyeballs? most > likely a class 2 stack, which would need an upgrade anyway. > > cheers, > Ole > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
