Agreed.

On 9/14/10 10:50 AM, "Jason Weil" <[email protected]> wrote:

> True. 
> 
> Usable in a dual-stack environment.
> 
> Not usable IPv6-only.
> 
> Jason
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Jason Brzozowski
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:46 AM
>> To: Weil, Jason (CCI-Atlanta); [email protected]; Suresh Krishnan
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: AW: New version available
>> 
>> XP has limitations but is still usable if IPv6 is enabled.
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/14/10 10:40 AM, "Jason Weil" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> The whole lack of IPv6 transport in XP for DNS kinda fails
>> the 'full IPv6
>>> support without DHCPv6' classifier for me.
>>> 
>>> Jason
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>>> Behalf Of Ole Troan
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:32 AM
>>>> To: Suresh Krishnan
>>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: AW: New version available
>>>> 
>>>> Suresh,
>>>> 
>>>>>> 4) full IPv6 support without DHCPv6
>>>>>> 5) full IPv6 support with DHCPv6
>>>>>> by partly broken I mean lacking dual stack / IPv4/IPv6
>>>> multihoming support. i.e happy eyeballs or having other
>>>> serious short comings. I do not want to enable IPv6 on hosts
>>>> implementations that e.g have 75 second timeout to switch
>>>> from IPv6 to IPv4 (well known fruit vendor).
>>>>>> we don't care about 1. we do _not_ want to deliver IPv6
>>>> service to 2 + 3. so the problematic one is 4.
>>>>>> does anyone know of any class 4 IPv6 implementation?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Windows XP.
>>>> 
>>>> does XP come with IPv6 enabled by default? if not I would
>>>> classify it with Win95... i.e. don't care.
>>>> with IPv6 enabled, does it even give me happy eyeballs? most
>>>> likely a class 2 stack, which would need an upgrade anyway.
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Ole
>>>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> =========================================
>> John Jason Brzozowski
>> Comcast Cable
>> e) mailto:[email protected]
>> o) 609-377-6594
>> m) 484-962-0060
>> w) http://www.comcast6.net
>> =========================================
>> 
>> 

=========================================
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
e) mailto:[email protected]
o) 609-377-6594
m) 484-962-0060
w) http://www.comcast6.net
=========================================

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to