On 3/27/12 8:43 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
On 03/27/2012 09:33 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:All, The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on changing the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses over privacy addresses during the address selection process.Brian: Terminology issue here: Are "public addresses" a short hand for "IPv6 addresses with Modified EUI-64 format identifiers"? -- I ask because all of these addresses are public.
Based on the terminology in 3484 and 3484bis, I am asking for the WG's view of preferring public over temporary (rather than private) addresses as defined in RFC 4941.
Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
