Russ Edmunds wrote: > *** The idea of slower code is a good one - and many testers have used > that. I didn't hear KMTI so I don't know at what speed they ran it. But > I think the speed you propose is too slow. At those lengths one could > have a fade-up which would be shorter than one sequence of code.
Hi Russ, When I mean slow, I'm talking extra slow. The stations already run morse at similar speeds to NDBs, but I am talking about slowing it down much slower than that, to the point that the actual dits, dahs and dashes are plainly visible in the Spectrum Lab waterfall display. My idea isn't geared to just slow it down to where folks can follow the CW characters, but to the point where Spectrum Lab can easily display the morse characters on signals so weak that they would be inaudible to the ear. 73, Brandon Jordan Memphis, TN www.bcdx.org _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
