Even stranger, just a few miles to the west of Bruce, my next strongest hets are/were on 684, 693 and 837 - take your pick. I have the Puget Sound between Bruce's QTH and mine - can that make such a difference?
Kevin > I had absolutely no trace of TA's below 900. The lowest was a het on > 909, which oddly enough you don't have listed here. It's amazing the > difference 100km can make (I suspect you guys have an "unfair" advantage > having lots of salt water to the east). > > The lack of low band stuff might have been just local interference. It > doesn't help to have four locals with 10-50kw between 710 and 880 :-( > > OTOH, 1134 and 1215 had some nice audio at times, so I can;t complain > too loudly. > > Bruce in Seattle > R8A/SDR-IQ, K9AY > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Carriers and some multiples on the following frequencies - >> some yielding wispy audio... >> >> 531 (X2), 594, 621, 639,675, 747, 756, 774!, 783, 801, 819, >> 828, 837, 855 (X2), 864, 873, 891, 918, 927, 1017, 1044, 1053(X2) >> >> I have not heard a hornets next of carriers and near audio >> like this in SOME TIME. >> >> Enjoy and good luck! >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
