Thanks to all who responded.  I was hoping that it could have been
Colombia, as noted in last year's PEI DXpedition.  73,....Walt


On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:57 AM, James Renfrew <[email protected]>wrote:

> Agrred.  XEQ has been slightly low for a long time, and the whistle is
> there right now.  Jim Renfrew, Holley NY
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Sylvain Naud <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Le 2013-10-27 00:29, Chuck a écrit :
> >
> >> Walt -
> >>
> >> XEQ has been low (about 940  939.874) for years and years but aside from
> >> that, I don't know anyone else off frequency.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Agreed.  I have XEQ  logged on last Oct. 5th at -120Hz.
> >
> > Sylvain
> > ______________________________**_________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/**mailman/listinfo/irca<
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca>
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: [email protected]
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to