XEMMM has been on 940 for as long as I can remember. It is Tijuana (Now XESPN) 
that is on 800. CX were ok to So Cal area last evening and I have a carrier on 
940.17 as well, but no audio.

I'll go back over a few recording I have from when cx were superb to So Cal and 
see if I can drag up any audio. I've had Mexicali on 820 and 990 here a few 
times over the years.

Of course this is not to be confused with XEQ which has been on the low side of 
940 for years.  73 KAZ Barrington IL


-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike Sanburn <[email protected]>
>Sent: Oct 27, 2013 8:23 AM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
><[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Unid off Freq. 940.173
>
>I should get the latest IRCA Mexican log. I assume XEMMM moved to 940 from 
>800?  ms
>
>> From: [email protected]
>> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 23:08:59 -0700
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Unid off Freq. 940.173
>> 
>> My observation in Southern California is that XEMMM has been high in 
>> frequency for at least three years. When I can null KFIG or it takes a fade 
>> I can occasionally make out the programming, which I have been able to match 
>> to its webstream. 
>> 
>> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: Glenn Hauser <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Unid off Freq. 940.173
>> 
>> Walt,
>> 
>> XEMMM in Mexicali. Discussed this recently in my logs. Always hear the het 
>> in the morning here. Getting definite ID is tough, but DF fits and there 
>> have been previous logs of it. See MW offsets list:
>> 
>> 940  940.174     MEX XEMMM-AM 940 Oldies (Mexicali/Santa Isabel)             
>>                                   [939.9839-]         20100406
>> 
>> 73, Glenn Hauser, OK
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: [email protected]
>> 
>                                         
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
>contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
>editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to